[Lilug Planning] {Spam?} Re: Dec 13th meeting topic(s)

[Jesse Farinacci]

Greetings,

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Matt Surico <surico at mail.buoy.com> wrote:
> We (government and planning members) probably subconsciously assumed that
> since most of the people who show up at most of the meetings have been
> members for over a year (many for several years) that they are familiar with
> the election process.  Totally wrong assumption, of course!

I think that is totally understandable, actually. Just didn't work out
well this time.

> If the LILUG gov't feels that it's appropriate (and I'm starting to think it
> is) we can put out an announcement in the next day or so that we will take
> more nominations at the December meeting, and then we will hold elections at
> the meeting.
>
> The LILUG by-laws state that officers can only hold a gov't position for 12
> months (but can be re-elected; still an election needs to take place every
> 12 months) so we really do need to hold an election in December.
>
> Mark and Matt N are on this planning list so I am sure they are reading
> this.  Matt, Mark, Mike and I will take this offline and decide about the
> nomination

Ok, thank you for reviewing it. I think the idea you proposed above
would be sufficient for me personally.. I await the review of the
board.

-Jesse

-- 
There are 10 types of people in this world, those
that can read binary and those that can not.