[Lilug] Recommend nvidia card

[Jonathan Dahan]

I use nvidia and like it, just note that kernel 2.6.28 and the 180.xx series
of binary blobs don't play well together.

- Jonathan

On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 12:26 AM, Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle at coredump.us>wrote:

>
> On Sat, February 7, 2009 1:26 pm, Kenneth Downs wrote:
> > i'm looking for the cheapest nvidia card that will be very happy with
> > Ubuntu and the fancy desktop nonsense^H^H^H^H^H effects.
> >
> > This would go into an existing machine as a 2nd card.
> >
> > I know Nvidia plays nice with Linux, but this is not for gaming, and I
> > don't want to spend $200.00.  But I'm nervous to go low end and find it
> > does not support the effects.
> >
> > Any recommendations?
>
> Actually, I'd be very surprised if I heard that even the lowest end Nvidia
> card didn't support all of the compiz effects.  The main thing I'd look
> for would be a video card that didn't require a fan [silence is a great
> thing] and just double-check that it supported OpenGL.  The compiz effects
> aren't very taxing as video effects go -- the "better" video cards do fast
> texture rendering and have good built-in pixel shaders, but I think none
> of those things are needed for what you're looking to do.  An Intel card
> should be fine too.  An ATi card would also work, but I'd make sure that
> it had an open source ATi driver, which is important because the older ATi
> cards went out of support for 3D drivers and became a relatively unhappy
> situation.
>
> IMHO the main thing 3D gets you is the ability to play 3D games.  A lot of
> people enjoy playing with Compiz Fusion because the effects are pretty,
> but I likewise tried it, played with it, and found it wasn't for me --
> tended needlessly distract me more than help me.
>
> Nvidia cards do have good Linux support, but things have gotten more
> complicated -- the driver now occasionally splits into "old" and "new"
> drivers, and the old drivers have to be hacked by other people in order to
> get them to work with newer kernels.  If you build your own kernels, you
> also have to taint the kernel with a open-source but proprietary driver
> that has to be built for each version of the kernel you install.  There
> are also other driver installation methods, but the other methods tend not
> to use package management, or deactivate the Ubuntu Nvidia drivers when
> installing new ones, leading to confusion (the 'envyng' method).  Oh,
> yeah, and avoid Nvidia G84 and G86 chips, because they have manufacture
> defects that cause failure due to heat because internal portions of the
> chip don't get cooled properly.  There's a good wikipedia page that
> explains which cards have those chips in them.
>
> And oh by-the-way, the Nvidia kernel driver is larger than the entire
> Linux kernel itself.  The Nvidia driver I have loaded right now is about 7
> MB.  Not a big deal because memory sizes are comparatively large today,
> but it's also not as memory efficient as it could be, and slowly grows
> until a new driver set is started.
>
> So there are benefits and drawbacks when it comes to performance vs
> openness and support.
>
>  -- Chris
>
> --
>
> Chris Knadle
> Chris.Knadle at coredump.us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lilug mailing list
> Lilug at lilug.org
> http://lists.lilug.org/listinfo.cgi/lilug-lilug.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lilug.org/pipermail/lilug-lilug.org/attachments/20090208/9d76b964/attachment-0003.htm>